Week 5: Go the Way Your Blood Beats
Artwork by Rommy Torrico
Queer-affirming, Trans-affirming, and Collective Value, a Black Lives Matter lesson plan, offers a powerful lineup of articles and resources to center queer and trans voices in conversations about the movement for racial justice. The questions that the lesson plan authors pose are useful and certainly offer opportunities for rich dialogue, but, as an elementary school teacher, I am thinking about the best ways to make these resources and concepts accessible for younger students and/or students with limited literacy and comprehension skills.
The strongest element of the lesson plan, for me, is the menu of extensions/action items for students to engage in following the discussion. The options are varied and meaningful, and allow for students to engage with the material in an authentic way, allowing for reflection through action. The options allow students to explore and deepen their understanding of the intersectional analysis presented in the lesson plan, which allows for a powerful extension of the lesson. I especially love the “Lifting the Stories” option where students can research a queer or trans person of color from the movement and “lift” up their stories by educating others about their contributions. The imagery of lifting up the stories of others is so beautiful.
The resources linked in the lesson plan provide some complex insights into the ways in which POC in the queer and trans community have been erased from or shrouded within history. Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera’s roles in the Stonewall riots and the subsequent movement were ignored and almost forgotten. White gay men have been portrayed as the leaders of Stonewall and the movement that followed in most historical accounts.
The interview with James Baldwin also offered some fascinating reflections on the intersection of his racial identity and sexuality. I was so moved by the beauty of his words, and would like to highlight a few quotations:
“Loving anybody and being loved by anybody is a tremendous danger, a tremendous responsibility...The discovery of one’s sexual preferences doesn’t have to be a trauma. It’s a trauma because it’s such a traumatized society.”
“Loving anybody and being loved by anybody is a tremendous danger, a tremendous responsibility...The discovery of one’s sexual preferences doesn’t have to be a trauma. It’s a trauma because it’s such a traumatized society.”
- Trauma is manufactured, created, and recreated based on a set of criteria that society determines.
- America’s infantilism is certainly recognized abroad. When consuming Italian media, this is a common thread in their news stories on the U.S., especially now in the age of President #45.
- Fear is one of the many tools of white supremacy and is utilized by the State in full force to exert control over people. Baldwin’s argument makes me think about women’s reproductive rights and the ways that the government uses shame and guilt to try to control women’s bodies.
- Our obsession with binaries and labels is so problematic and perpetuates systems of inequality on a daily basis. I recently got into a terribly serious (and long) argument with my brother about this with regard to flexibility in gender pronouns. He was mortified at the idea of gender neutral pronouns. How would we know how to move in the world without she and he, his and her?
“I think white gay people feel cheated because they were born, in principle, into a society in which they were supposed to be safe.”
- There is so much to unpack here. This sentiment feels connected to some of the themes and discourse present in the interviews from The Whiteness Project. There is a sense from many white people that because they have other marginalized identities they somehow don’t experience the full benefits of white privilege.



Hi Lindsay,
ReplyDeleteI too felt moved by James Baldwin's words in his interview with Richard Goldstein. A word can be so powerful and yet not having the right word can be so limiting. I appreciate your reflection on the trouble with labels and how labels perpetuate systems of inequality. I don't think there is enough conversation about the damage society can do by labeling, categorizing, or stereotyping. What is this human need we have to label? Or, within the concept of nature vs. nurture, is it less about human nature and more about how our American society has nurtured us that creates this primal need to label? Do we label because we live in groups and need to know whether someone is part of our in-group or part of the out-group? Do we label merely to understand?
Heidi
Thanks for your post Lindsay--for exploring the connections in this lesson plan for younger folks and for calling out some powerful Baldwin excerpts. In her blog post Brigitte wondered about a sort of parallel in Baldwin's rejection of the "gay" label and the notion of colorblindness--I don't see Black, I just see you as a human...What do you make of this comparison?
ReplyDeleteBest
Victoria